I also have a dream.

 Quite simply judges are human beings and if a random sample of twelve people can agree to force a case of injustice then one person is more likely to do so Therefore in the stage of the United States the view of historical evolution was put forward and it was explained that only when the defendant himself waived the right to be adjudicated by the jury could the judge adjudicate As for the conviction by government agencies Americans will tell you that it was not a private act to send almost all Jews to concentration camps or even gas ovens because of racial prejudice but directly organized by the German Nazi government It is easy for us to understand this truth After beam impact tubes the Cultural Revolution people who received letters of redress for unjust false and wrong cases did not lack the seal of the public security procuratorial and judicial organs in their hands

As for saying that the jury in this small town is suspected of unfair judgment it should transfer... [Details]